Skip to main content
Support

Browse by category

All categories
Fermentation Atlas

Alcoholic drinks from Northern Nigeria and Ghana

Pito and burukutu (Nigeria, Ghana)pito

Sorghum is malted, dried and ground, then mashed and boiled. The filtered wort is left overnight to sour with lactic bacteria, boiled again, cooled and fermented by yeast for a day. The clear top is drunk as pito; burukutu is the thick, brown version made with added gari (cassava meal). Made in 9 steps over 6.3 days – 9 days. The longest step, sprout the grain, takes 4–5 days (Lyumugabe F 2012). Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the dominant yeast and Lactobacillus fermentum, the dominant lactic bacterium from the malt through souring do most of the fermenting.

Key numbers
Main step4–5 daysReported[lyumugabe2012]Sprout the grain
Temperature30–33 °CMeasured[sawadogo2007]Leave the wort to sour
AciditypH 5.6 → 3.72Measured[sawadogo2007]Leave the wort to sour
Fully documentedAlcoholic drinks6.3 days – 9 daysMore alcoholic drinksMore from NigeriaMore from Ghana

Recipe

No fixed amounts recordedThe sources describe the steps but give no fixed amounts; brewers work by eye.
Red or white sorghum grain, and sometimes maize · Malted by steeping and sprouting[lyumugabe2012]
Water[lyumugabe2012]
Gari (cassava meal) · Added at mashing for burukutu only; pito has no adjunct[lyumugabe2012]
Yeast · Fermentation is spontaneous or uses yeast kept from earlier brews; dried yeast from Ghanaian pito sites is almost all Saccharomyces cerevisiae[glover2005]
Starter: spontaneous, or dried yeast kept from earlier brews

Total time across the recorded steps: 6.3 days – 9 days

Start
Drag the bar or press Play
Close-up: water moving into a grain

What changes: Sorghum grain soaks up water

Step 1 of 9
Steep the sorghum
Time
24 h – 2 days
Reported
Temperature
Not documented
Salt
None given
Acidity
Not documented
Which microbes the steps name, step by step
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Yeasts
Lactobacillus fermentum
Lactic acid bacteria
L. fermentum

Output: wet grain.

Flavour
Not documented
Texture
Not documented
Colour
Not documented

Microbes at work in this step

Not documented for this step.

Method

Measured measured in a studySet fixed by a specification or tested recipeReported one source reports itTypical a general value, not sourced for this fermentUnconfirmed not yet checked against a source

What makes this one different

Pito and burukutu are soured on purpose before the yeast goes in. The wort is left overnight for lactic bacteria, boiled again, and only then fermented, so the beer is sour as well as alcoholic. Burukutu adds gari, cassava meal, to the mash.

Related ferments

Variants

  • BurukutuGari (cassava meal) is added at mashing; the beer is drunk as a thick, brown suspension.
  • Dolo (Burkina Faso)Sorghum beer brewed from the same soured wort; now a full entry, dolo.

Safety

In a study in rural Nigeria, brewing cut the mycotoxins carried in from the sorghum by 59.3–94.8 %, leaving pito at or below 5 μg/kg. Sorghum beers in general are drunk while still fermenting and spoil fast, usually within 3 days in summer or 5 in winter.

Hazards the sources name: Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Shigella, below 10^4 cfu/ml in market pito near Accra (preprint).

History and sources

Every number is labelled with how it is known. How this atlas is made

Ekundayo described pito brewing in Nigeria in 1969, and Faparusi and colleagues studied the microbes of burukutu in 1973.

  1. [lyumugabe2012] Lyumugabe F., Gros J., Nzungize J., Bajyana E., Thonart P. 2012, Characteristics of African traditional beers brewed with sorghum malt: a review, Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement 16(4):509–530 (section 5.5 citing Ekundayo 1969 and Faparusi et al. 1973)paper
  2. [sawadogo2007] Sawadogo-Lingani H., Lei V., Diawara B., Nielsen D.S., Møller P.L., Traoré A.S., Jakobsen M. 2007, The biodiversity of predominant lactic acid bacteria in dolo and pito wort for the production of sorghum beer, Journal of Applied Microbiology 103(4):765–777, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03306.x (abstract)paper
  3. [glover2005] Glover R.L., Abaidoo R.C., Jakobsen M., Jespersen L. 2005, Biodiversity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolated from a survey of pito production sites in various parts of Ghana, Systematic and Applied Microbiology 28(8):755–761, doi:10.1016/j.syapm.2005.05.003 (abstract)paper
  4. [ezekiel2015] Ezekiel C.N., Abia W.A., Ogara I.M., Sulyok M., Warth B., Krska R. 2015, Fate of mycotoxins in two popular traditional cereal-based beverages (kunu-zaki and pito) from rural Nigeria, LWT Food Science and Technology 60(1):137–141, doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2014.08.018 (abstract)paper
  5. [johansen2019] Johansen P.G. et al. 2019, Occurrence and importance of yeasts in indigenous fermented food and beverages produced in sub-Saharan Africa, Frontiers in Microbiology 10:1789, doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01789paper
  6. [minamor2017] Minamor A.A., Larteley A.M., Laryea E.N., Afutu E., Tetteh-Quarcoo P.B. 2017, Microbiological quality of a locally brewed alcoholic beverage (pito) sold in a community within the Greater Accra Region, Ghana, Preprints 201701.0003 (abstract; not peer reviewed)paper